Legal Opinion

Baker v. Keller

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1921No. Civ. No. 2202PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Sacramento County allowing an attorney’s fee for extraordinary services in a probate proceeding. - Charles 0. Busick, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an appeal by C. W. Baker and B. Platnauer, attorneys for John Gerber, as one of the executors of the last will of Conrad Iser, deceased, from an order allowing said attorneys a fee “for extraordinary services” professionally rendered by them for said Gerber, as such executor.

It appears that Adam Keller, coexecutor with said Gerber of the last will of said Iser, deceased, brought an action in the superior court in and for the county of Sacramento, against said Gerber, as such executor, upon two' claims against the estate of said deceased aggregating the sum of $10,380, of which the sum…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Head v. HargraveSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Corbin Cabinet Lock Co. v. Eagle Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Forsyth v. DoolittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WallaceIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Duffill v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Estate of SchererCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Hillman v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Nylund v. MadsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. In Re Estate of ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API