Legal Opinion

Estate of McDonald

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1940No. Civ. 2506PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSON, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order allowing attorneys’ fees for extraordinary services in the above-entitled estate matter. The respondents filed in said estate matter a petition for attorneys’ fees for extraordinary services, praying for an allowance of $40,000 or “forty per cent of the properties and monies” awarded to the estate by a judgment in a superior court action brought by the administratrix against 15 defendants, in which action the administratrix was represented by petitioners as her attorneys. Upon the filing of said petition for attorneys’ fees, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. Eilers Music Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. In Re Estate of ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Ludwig v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Ellis v. RademacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Zagoren v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ayers v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Knoff v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Colvig v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Kanner v. Globe Bottling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API