Legal Opinion

Freese v. Pennie

California Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1895No. 15990PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Walter H. Levy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

James C. Pennie, having acted as administrator de bonis non of the estate of Thomas H. *468Blythe, deceased, from May, 1889, until his death in December, 1893, his executor, James C. Pennie, Jr., the defendant herein, was cited in this proceeding to account for his testator’s administration of the estate of Blythe. In answer to this citation he rendered an account of such administration, in which he claimed a credit for his testator for fees paid and to be paid to Messrs. Naphtaly, Freidenrich & Ackerman, for legal services rendered in the matter of the estate of Blythe during the term of his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of DorlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Duffill v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Mitchell v. TowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles-Inyo Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Guardianship of JacobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API