Legal Opinion

Estate of Scherer

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1943No. Civ. 13865PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

A rehearing was granted in this case that we might give further consideration to respondent’s claim that the appeal should be dismissed for the asserted reason that appellant has neither an interest in the subject-matter of the appeal, nor is she an aggrieved party within the contemplation of the code section designating those entitled to appeal from an order or judgment; and the further claim that appellant has no standing in any proceeding to reverse or modify the decision or order (Prob. Code, sec. 1233; Code Civ. Proc., sec. 938).

The controversy with which we are here concerned centers…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Estate of King v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Stearns v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Fritz v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Goff v. GoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. In Re Estate of ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Estate of ReinhertzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Estate of ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hutchinson v. DowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Sammons v. DavisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Seymour v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API