Carr-Gottstein Properties, Ltd. Partnership v. Benedict
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A lot owner violated a covenant in her subdivision by taking more than one year to finish construction on her lot. The covenant contained a flat-rate, per diem liquidated damages provision for covenant violations. The issue presented by this appeal is whether flat-rate, per diem liquidated damages can be charged for construction delays that vio late subdivision covenant regulations. We reverse the superior court and hold that such a clause is permissible in this case because the developer's liquidated damages clause attempts to address a situation…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Phillips v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Division of Corrections, Department of Health & Social Services v. NeakokAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Lee Houston & Associates, Ltd. v. RacineAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- ARCO Alaska, Inc. v. AkersAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. Bowie Industries, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Estate of Maldonado v. BaileyAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Lake & Peninsula Borough Assembly v. OberlatzAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Soules v. RamstackAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Dominic Wenzell, D.M.D. P.C. v. IngrimAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.