Legal Opinion

Lee Houston & Associates, Ltd. v. Racine

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1991No. 3668PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

This case involves several claims arising from alleged misconduct of a real estate agent. On appeal, we must review trial court determinations with respect to (1) when the claims accrued for purposes of the statute of limitations, (2) which statute(s) of limitation apply to the various claims, and, if any of the claims were timely brought, and (3) whether the plaintiff submitted sufficient evidence to avoid a directed verdict on her prayer for two items of damages (lost profits and punitive damages).

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Aletha and Wayne Racine lived together…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Austin v. Fulton Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Kodiak Electric Ass'n v. Delaval Turbine, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Haakanson v. Wakefield Seafoods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Wettanen v. CowperAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Shaw v. State, Department of Administration, Public Defender AgencyAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  5. Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API