Legal Opinion

Soules v. Ramstack

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2004No. S-11034PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Mary Ellen Soules, personal representative of the Estate of Pauline King, appeals the superior court’s decision holding that the estate is contractually obligated to pay a special assessment levied against a condominium that the estate sold to Betty Ram-stack. Soules contracted to sell the unit to Ramstack in March 2002 and agreed to pay any assessments due at closing. The condominium association approved a special assessment in December 2001 and notified all owners of the assessment in early January 2002. Those who were then negotiating to sell their…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Bennett v. BennettAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Rausch v. DevineAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Consolidated Construction Services, Inc. v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Alaska Sales and Service, Inc. v. MilletAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Lake & Peninsula Borough Assembly v. OberlatzAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Laybourn v. City of WasillaAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Canopy Corp. v. Symantec Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 2005
  5. Romero v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API