Legal Opinion

ARCO Alaska, Inc. v. Akers

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1988No. S-1923, S-1947PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

Paul Akers, was employed by ARCO Alaska, Inc. for approximately six and one-half years as a mechanical technician at Prudhoe Bay. This appeal concerns his termination.

FACTS

Akers accepted an offer of employment from ARCO in 1976. At that time he was told that North Slope oil field jobs were expected to be available for approximately twenty years, the life of the field. Akers was given a Prudhoe Bay employee handbook upon his hiring and other copies from time to time as they were revised. The employee handbook which was in effect at the time Akers was discharged…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gaglidari v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Francis v. Lee Enterprises, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. O.K. Lumber Co. v. Providence Washington Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API