Legal Opinion

Estate of Maldonado v. Bailey

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2005No. S-11067PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

1. INTRODUCTION

We granted review to determine whether a surviving spouse’s wrongful death proceeds should be included within the decedent’s augmented estate as property of the surviving spouse, thereby offsetting the surviving spouse’s elective share. The superior court included the wrongful death proceeds in the augmented estate on the theory that it was property owned by the surviving spouse at the decedent’s death. Because we conclude that any interest in wrongful death proceeds is not owned by the surviving spouse at the time of the decedent’s death, we reverse…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Walls v. American Optical Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  3. John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. L.D.G., Inc. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Prentzel v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. State, Department of Environmental ConservationAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Jones v. Bowie Industries, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Municipality of Anchorage v. AdamsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API