Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Phillips

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1992No. D-0107PublishedCited by 231 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HECHT, Justice.

We granted the applications for writ of error in this case to decide whether a contractual provision that requires payment of a multiple of actual damages for breach of trust is an unenforceable penalty, and if so, whether the defense of penalty was waived because it was not pleaded. The trial court and court of appeals refused to enforce the provision. 792 S.W.2d 269 (Tex.App.1990). We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

During 32 years of marriage, Harry and Martha Phillips accumulated over $18 million in community property, primarily through the oil and gas…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Burt v. LochausenTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Stewart v. BaseyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Turner, Collie & Braden, Inc. v. Brookhollow, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Oil Field Haulers Ass'n v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Texas & Pacific Coal Co. v. LawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1896

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by231 opinions

  1. Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Aquaplex, Inc. v. Rancho La Valencia, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Citizens National Bank v. Allen Rae Investments Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Lee C. Ritchie v. Ann Caldwell Rupe, as Trustee for the Dallas Gordon Rupe, III 1995 Family TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  5. BMG Direct Marketing, Inc. v. PeakeTexas Supreme Court · 2005

226 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API