Legal Opinion

Dominic Wenzell, D.M.D. P.C. v. Ingrim

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 2010No. S-13347PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Dominic Wenzell purchased a private dental clinic in Anchorage from Guy Ingrim. The purchase agreement included a "Covenant Not to Compete" prohibiting Ingrim from the "practice of dentistry" within fifteen miles of his old elinie for two years and within ten miles for an additional three years. One year after the sale, Ingrim began employment as a dentist at the Alaska Native Medical Center (ANMC), two miles away from the clinic. Wenzell sued in superior court for breach of the covenant not to compete. The superior court found as a matter of law that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. K & K RECYCLING, INC. v. Alaska Gold Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. National Bank of Alaska v. J. B. L. & K. of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Sykes v. Melba Creek Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Neal & Co. v. Association of Village Council Presidents Regional Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kalenka v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Chambers v. ScofieldAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Price v. UNISEA, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Tesoro Alaska Company v. Union Oil Company of CaliforniaAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Kalenka v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API