Kenney v. Kenney
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Judge.
The principal question presented is whether the mother presented sufficient evidence and the court found sufficient facts to show a material change in the circumstances affecting the welfare of the two oldest children. It is well established in this State that a change of circumstances affecting the welfare of the child must be shown before an order relating to the child’s custody may be modified. G.S. 50-13.7; Shepherd v. Shepherd, 273 N.C. 71, 159 S.E. 2d 357; In re Harrell, 11 N.C. App. 351, 181 S.E. 2d 188; In re Poole, 8 N.C. App. 25, 173 S.E. 2d 545; Rothman v. Rothman, 6…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shepherd v. ShepherdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Rothman v. RothmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- In Re the Custody of MarloweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- In Re McCraw ChildrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- In Re HarrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Goble v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Craven v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Hedrick v. Southland Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Hensley v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Roberts v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980