Legal Opinion

Kenney v. Kenney

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 23, 1972No. 7210DC515PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Judge.

The principal question presented is whether the mother presented sufficient evidence and the court found sufficient facts to show a material change in the circumstances affecting the welfare of the two oldest children. It is well established in this State that a change of circumstances affecting the welfare of the child must be shown before an order relating to the child’s custody may be modified. G.S. 50-13.7; Shepherd v. Shepherd, 273 N.C. 71, 159 S.E. 2d 357; In re Harrell, 11 N.C. App. 351, 181 S.E. 2d 188; In re Poole, 8 N.C. App. 25, 173 S.E. 2d 545; Rothman v. Rothman, 6…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. ShepherdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Rothman v. RothmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. In Re the Custody of MarloweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. In Re McCraw ChildrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. In Re HarrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goble v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Craven v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Hedrick v. Southland Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Hensley v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Roberts v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API