Hedrick v. Southland Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendants first contend that the Commission erred in allowing into the record the plaintiff’s social security file containing medical reports of various doctors and in using these reports to establish plaintiff’s disability under G.S. 97-38. The Deputy Commissioner made the following findings of fact, based on these records, which were adopted by the Full Commission.
“8. On June 25, 1973, Dr. Robert A. Huffaker, a psychiatrist with offices in Durham, North Carolina, reported his findings concerning a psychiatric evaluation of the plaintiff widow. At that time she gave a history…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Sims ex rel. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Joseph E. Thomas v. Ruth A. Martin HoganCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Gaines v. L. D. Swain & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. IngramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- Roberts v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Gaines v. Moffitt Pierce Constr.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2004
- Gainey v. Jerry S. Shelton TruckingNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2005
- Owen-Wagner v. FoodsNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.