Hensley v. Hensley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Defendant first assigns error to the following findings of the court: That there has been no substantial change in the circumstances under which the child is being reared in the home than existed when the court entered its order on 7 February 1972; that plaintiff customarily left her daughter under the care and supervision of appropriate persons; that plaintiff was a fit person to have the care, custody, and control of the minor daughter. All these findings of fact are based upon competent evidence, and they will not be disturbed on appeal. Music House v. Theatres, 10 N.C. App.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Jarman v. JarmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- In Re HarrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Dunham's Music House, Inc. v. Asheville Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- In Re the Custody of MasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- King v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Pritchard v. PritchardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Wehlau v. WitekCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Vuncannon v. VuncannonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Paschall v. PaschallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975