In Re the Custody of Marlowe
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.
Judge Falls was correct in holding that the Florida decree of divorce was final, but the control and custody of minor children cannot be determined finally. Changed conditions will always justify inquiry by the courts in the interest and welfare of the children, and decrees may be entered as often as the facts justify. 27 B C.J.S., Divorce, Sec. 317(1).
This case is quite similar to that of Richter v. Harmon, 243 N.C. 373, 90 S.E. 2d 744, which was also a case involving the custody of a child then in North Carolina whose custody had been awarded to the mother by a Florida court. The child was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kniepkamp v. RichardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Drake v. DrakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Freund v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Callahan v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Griffith v. GriffithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Shoaf v. ShoafSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Spence v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Crane v. HayesSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Rothman v. RothmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Davenport v. DavenportCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.