Legal Opinion

In Re Harrell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 26, 1971No. 712DC223PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

The exceptions in the record present the question of whether the findings of fact are supported by the evidence, and whether the facts found support the order continuing custody of James A. Harrell, Jr., in the father under the terms and conditions of the order entered by Judge Hubbard dated 19 October 1966.

The pertinent part of Judge Hubbard’s order whieh petitioner seeks to have modified reads as follows:

“The court having heard the evidence of both parties and having had a conference with the parties and their counsel finds that the present interests of said minors will best…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Teague v. TeagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Neighbors v. NeighborsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Thomas Ex Rel. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Elmore v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Searl v. SearlCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Balawejder v. BalawejderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Hensley v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Kenney v. KenneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Hassell v. MeansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API