Legal Opinion

Craven v. Chambers

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1982No. 8121SC527PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in awarding attorney’s fees and expert witness fees to plaintiff. On his cross-appeal, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred (1) in excluding testimony and medical bills from plaintiff’s psychiatrist; (2) in not submitting an issue of punitive damages to the jury; and (3) in excluding testimony about plaintiff’s physical and mental condition before and after the accident. Because defendant’s issues can be summarily addressed, we discuss plaintiff’s issues first.

I

Relying on Williamson v. Bennett, 251 N.C. 498, 112 S.E. 2d 48…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Kimberly v. HowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Kimberly v. . HowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Heath v. KirkmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Coastal Production Credit Ass'n v. Goodson Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Goble v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Brandenburg Land Co. v. Champion International Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Wyatt v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API