Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Edwards

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1980No. 8019SC202PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error the refusal of the trial court to let the jury hear testimony of three witnesses respecting their observations with reference to plaintiffs pain and suffering. We must note at the outset that one of defendant’s exceptions to the record on appeal was that plaintiff simply photographed pages 43-57 of the court reporter’s transcript without narrating the proceedings which led up to the court’s ruling on these witnesses’ testimony. The trial judge sustained this exception to the record. Thereafter, plaintiff did not go back and narrate the proceedings for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Robertson Ex Rel. Robertson v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Potts v. HowserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Table Rock Lumber Co. v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Gasque v. . AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Pridgen v. Holeman Produce Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dunn v. CusterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Bradley Woodcraft, Inc. v. BoddenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Bowers v. OlfCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API