Legal Opinion

Shepherd v. Shepherd

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1968No. 689PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeaNCh, J.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in modifying the custody order without a finding of fact of any change of circumstances affecting the welfare of the child. This assignment of error is based on exceptions duly noted. Langley v. Langley, 268 N.C. 415, 150 S.E. 2d 764.

As a general rule, the court in which a divorce action is instituted acquires jurisdiction over the custody of unemancipated children of the parties, and such jurisdiction continues even after the divorce. This phase of the court’s jurisdiction is properly activated by a motion in the cause. Cox v. Cox, 246 N.C. 528,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Eason v. SpenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Cox v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Blackley v. BlackleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Pulliam v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Spence v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Goodson v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API