Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to Conduct of Huffman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1999No. OSB 94-187; SC S43743PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar (Bar) filed a disciplinary complaint against the accused, stating three causes of complaint. The first cause alleged that the accused obtained default judgments against a former client regarding unpaid attorney fees and costs, refused to set aside the judgments after notice of the client’s bankruptcy, and disclosed client confidences or secrets in a letter dated December 10, 1993, to the client’s new attorney. The Bar alleged that the accused’s conduct, described in the first cause of complaint, violated Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchaffnerOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CarstensOregon Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Grievance Administrator v. LopatinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GattiOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re BryanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API