Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Carstens

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1984No. SC 28534PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar filed a complaint against Kurt Carstens, Jr. accusing him of unethical conduct in six separate causes. All causes arise, directly or indirectly, from the accused’s signing of his wife’s name to the certificates of title to three items of jointly owned personal property — a pickup truck, a boat trailer, and a boat.

The Bar’s complaint is dated August 17, 1982. The Trial Board found the accused guilty of only one cause of complaint and recommended that he receive a public reprimand. The seven member Disciplinary Review Board found the accused not guilty of all charges. We…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. LeonardOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  2. In Re MoynihanOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. LurchOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JordanOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of ThorpOregon Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re FrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChaseOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving SchulerAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KimmellOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Re AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API