Legal Opinion

Grievance Administrator v. Lopatin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2000No. 113250, Calendar No. 9PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

In this disciplinary matter, the Grievance Administrator, on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission (ago), appeals an Attorney Discipline Board (adb) order reducing the discipline imposed on respondent by a hearing panel from a forty-five-day suspension to a reprimand. We hold that the ADB erred as a matter of law in concluding that our prior order denying the Grievance Administrator’s application for leave to appeal barred it from suspending respondent for longer than forty-five days. In light of that error, and because the adb did not have the benefit of our guidance regarding use of…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Locricchio v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  5. CAF Investment Co. v. Saginaw TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1981

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. People v. LeBlancMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Burkhardt v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Grievance Administrator v. FiegerMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Grievance Administrator v. UnderwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Augustine v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API