Legal Opinion
Craig v. Baumgartner
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 23, 1934No. 29,634PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 254 N.W. 440. Action to have a contract for deed absolute on its face declared to be a mortgage.
On or about July 24, 1909, one Baumgartner entered into a contract for deed with plaintiff, Catherine Craig. Under the terms of the contract, Baumgartner agreed to sell and convey to the plaintiff certain property which he then owned upon the payment by her of $5,500. Plaintiff entered into possession of the premises and, it is claimed, has continued since to occupy the same as her homestead. Her husband occupied the premises with her until his death in 1931. In February, 1916, about…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Baker v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Equitable Loan & Security Co. v. LewmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Goodrich v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Stevens v. DennettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1872
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Hart v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Skolnick v. GruesnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Calhoun Realty Co. v. Edgewater Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.