Skolnick v. Gruesner
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
Defendant Olmsted County Bank and Trust Company appeals from an order denying its motion for judgment notAvithstanding the verdict for plaintiff or in the alternative for a new trial.
Appellant does business at Rochester, Minnesota. It is the only real defendant and avBI be so mentioned herein or designated merely as the bank. Why J. Gruesner and his wife, Ida, are joined as defendants is immaterial. They are not parties to this appeal and, except as Avitnesses, are out of the case.
Plaintiff sues, as the assignee of Ida Gruesner, for the amount of a special deposit made Avitli…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Bauman v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Branch v. DawsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Gordon v. Anthracite Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Holen v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Hart v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Winter v. Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Annis v. AnnisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Miller v. Minneapolis Underwriters Assn. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.