Legal Opinion
Hart v. Bell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 31, 1946No. 34,155PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 23 N.W.2d 375, 24 N.W.2d 41. Plaintiffs, all stockholders, appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
Plaintiffs Ivan B. Romig and C.W. Hart and one George S. Koffend in 1931 organized the Sports Afield Publishing Company, a Minnesota corporation, for the publication of a magazine known as Sports Afield. The new corporation, hereinafter called Sports Afield, issued four classes of stock, namely, (1) common stock with voting rights, (2) class A nonvoting common stock, and (3) two classes of preferred stock with no voting rights unless and until dividends thereon…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Manson v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Seitz v. MichelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Holen v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Guilford Glazer v. Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer, Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer v. Guilford GlazerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.