Legal Opinion
Goodrich v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 5, 1924No. 24,104PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
This case has been in this court before and a very full statement of the facts is found in 148 Minn. 219, 181 N. W. 333. Relative to the consideration for the contract, as imposed upon plaintiff and 17 other persons, ydio were parties of the second part as expressed in the contract, we find this language:
“In consideration of the concessions made as aforesaid, and in view of the general compromise and settlement of the telephone situation, second parties agree to use all reasonable means to prevent telephone agitation in the city of Anoka and endeavor to secure and cause to be maintained…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Katun Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation v. Terence Michael Clarke, a Florida CitizenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- In Re Estate of PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Regan v. BabcockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.