Legal Opinion
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Newton
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 9, 2002No. C1-02-16PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
Appellant Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent Theodore Witkowski. Wells Fargo contends that (1) the district court erroneously determined that a mortgage executed by respondent Michelle R. Newton is not a purchase-money mortgage; (2) under Minn.Stat. § 519.02 (1998), the spousal-signature requirement in Minn.Stat. § 507.02 (1998) does not apply to the mortgage because Newton owned the mortgaged property when she married Witkowski; and (3) the district court erroneously dismissed its claims…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mangan v. LandenNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Hoyt Properties, Inc. v. Production Resource Group, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. ChojnackiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Munoz v. PIPESTONE FINANCIAL, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- National City Bank v. EnglerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.