Legal Opinion
Boone v. Wright
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 20, 1992No. CC CV 89-1059; CA A64820; SC S38940; CC 90-C-10150; CA A65481; SC S38975PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.
Before 1989, the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA), ORS 138.510 to 138.680, imposed no time limit for persons convicted of crimes to file petitions for post-conviction relief. ORS 138.510(2) (1987) provided that petitions for post-conviction relief “may be filed without limit in time.” In 1989, the legislature amended ORS 138.510(2) to add a 120-day statute of limitations for filing petitions for post-conviction relief:
“A petition pursuant to ORS 138.510 to 138.680 must be filed within 120 days of the following, unless the court on hearing a subsequent petition finds grounds for relief…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Joseph v. LoweryOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Fullerton v. LammOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Davis & McMillan v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Bartz v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Owens v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Roseburg School District v. City of RoseburgOregon Supreme Court · 1993
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.