Legal Opinion

Joseph v. Lowery

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1972PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

The sole issue in this case is whether the trial court erred when it applied the law of comparative negligence to the accident in which plaintiff was injured. The accident occurred before the effective date of the recent legislative act which adopted the law of comparative negligence ① for Oregon but the trial was held thereafter. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appealed.

There is no provision in the statute which either requires or prohibits its retroactive application. However, statutes other than those which are procedural or remedial in nature are…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Western Seed Production Corp. v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Spicer v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway EmployeesOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hungerford v. Portland Sanitarium & Benevolent Ass'n.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Smith v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Shiflet v. EllerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  5. Derenco, Inc. v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1978

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API