Legal Opinion

Davis & McMillan v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1926No. Docket No. S.F. 11567PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This proceeding comes before this court at this time after the granting of the motion of respondents for a rehearing thereof. In the decision upon the former submission the award of the Industrial Accident Commission in favor of the employee Pulliam was annulled by this court on the ground that his claim for benefits instituted against his employer and the insurance carrier was barred by certain provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Stats. 1917, p. 831) and “that said subsection (e) of section 27 did not- have the effect of extending the statute of limitations on Pulliam’s claim…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Vance v. VanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Doehla v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Kerckhoff-Cuzner Mill & Lumber Co. v. OlmsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Allen v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. California Employment Stabilization Commission v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Douglas Aircraft Co. v. CranstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Mudd v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Boone v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1992

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API