Legal Opinion

School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 24, 1993No. 18-35383PublishedCited by 712 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

5 F.3d 1255

26 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1428, 85 Ed. Law Rep. 1070,

Prod.Liab.Rep.(CCH)P 13,640

SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1J, MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ACandS, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, et al.; E.J.

Bartells Company, a Washington corporation; A.P.

Green Refractories Company,

Defendants-Appellees.

SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1J, MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ACandS, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, et al., Defendants,

and

Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware corporation as successor in

interest to The Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products,

Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by712 opinions

  1. Leslie v. Grupo ICACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Nicholson v. Hyannis Air Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Garcia v. BiterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
  4. Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
  5. Teamsters Local 617 Pension & Welfare Funds v. Apollo Group, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2012

707 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API