Legal Opinion

Fullerton v. Lamm

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1945PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This case presents the question of the validity “of Ch. 265, Oregon Laws 1943, prescribing certain limitations with respect to actions for the recovery of overtime or premium pay and penalties authorized by any statute.

Plaintiff sued to recover overtime pay and penalties pursuant to the provisions of Public Law No. 718, 75th Congress, known as the “Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938”, (hereinafter referred to as F. L. S. A.) 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U. S. C. §§ 201 et seq. The act covers employees “engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce”. Section 6 establishes minimum wages to…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. State v. ShumwayOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Johnson v. Star MacHinery CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Boone v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Sunshine Dairy v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1948

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API