Legal Opinion

Roseburg School District v. City of Roseburg

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1993No. OTC 3242; SC S39874PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUnis, J.

The issue in this case is whether a storm drainage utility fee of the City of Roseburg (City) is a “tax on property” that is subject to the limitations of Article XI, section lib, of the Oregon Constitution, adopted in 1990 by an initiative petition commonly known as “Ballot Measure 5.”

Roseburg School District and interested taxpayers (taxpayers) filed a petition under ORS 305.583, asking the Oregon Tax Court (Tax Court) to declare that City’s storm drainage utility fee is a tax subject to the limitations of Article XI, section lib, of the Oregon Constitution. Both parties filed motions for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boone v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In the Matter of Marriage of Perlenfein and PerlenfeinOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Comeaux v. Water Wonderland Improvement DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. FrankOregon Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Ellis v. LoratiOregon Tax Court · 1999

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API