Legal Opinion

Whittemore Homes, Inc. v. Fleishman

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1961No. Civ. 6099PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.

This is an action to recover interest paid on an alleged usurious loan.

In general substance, the facts revealed by the record before us are as follows: Plaintiff owned 76 lots in Bakersfield. It needed $45,000 to construct residences thereon for sale. On October 31, 1957, defendant had sold his business, the transaction was in escrow and he desired to reinvest the money shortly expected therefrom. On that date plaintiff and defendant signed an agreement by which defendant agreed to advance to plaintiff the sum of $45,000 if the money was forthcoming within 30 days from the sale of his…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Lamb v. HerndonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Stock v. MeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Janisse v. Winston Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Westman v. DyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cross v. Capital Transaction Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Baruch Inv. Co. v. HuntoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Maze v. Sycamore Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Hardwick v. WilcoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Junkin v. Golden West Foreclosure Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API