Legal Opinion

Hardwick v. Wilcox

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 2017No. A147944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUVOLO, P. J.—

I. INTRODUCTION

Between 1999 and 2010, Albert P. Wilcox made a series of loans to James N. Hardwick. In 2013, Hardwick filed this action to recover usurious interest and prevent Wilcox from foreclosing on property securing his loans. Wilcox countersued for breach of contract and judicial foreclosure. The trial court entered judgment in favor of Hardwick, finding, among other things, that usurious interest payments made over the course of the relationship offset the principal debt, and that Hardwick could recover $227,235.83 in interest payments he made during the two years…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Winet v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Forte v. NolfiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Lamb v. HerndonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Stock v. MeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Loancare, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. Auctus Fund, LLC v. Sunstock, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
  3. Egrovich v. CCFG Costebelle La Jolla, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
  4. Grados v. ShiauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Korchemny v. PitermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API