Stock v. Meek
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to rescind the purchase from defendants, husband and wife, of space in a cooperatively-owned apartment house and to recover the amount she had paid defendants therefor. Defendants counterclaimed for interest that they had paid plaintiff on a usurious loan.
Early in 1945 defendants purchased the Palace Apartment Hotel in Long Beach. They intended to sell the 46 apartments to purchasers on an “own-your-own” plan. An escrow and trust were set up to convey title to purchasers, to pay expenses, and to distribute any profits.
Defendants consulted counsel about obtaining…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Jones v. MortimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Hannah v. SteinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- London & San Francisco Bank v. BandmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Riverisland Cold Storage, Inc. v. Fresno-Madera Production Credit Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- West Pico Furniture Co. v. Pacific Finance LoansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- G.H.I.I. v. MTS, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Ashland Oil Co. v. Union Oil Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1977
- Janisse v. Winston Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.