Legal Opinion

Stock v. Meek

California Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1950No. L. A. 20921PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to rescind the purchase from defendants, husband and wife, of space in a cooperatively-owned apartment house and to recover the amount she had paid defendants therefor. Defendants counterclaimed for interest that they had paid plaintiff on a usurious loan.

Early in 1945 defendants purchased the Palace Apartment Hotel in Long Beach. They intended to sell the 46 apartments to purchasers on an “own-your-own” plan. An escrow and trust were set up to convey title to purchasers, to pay expenses, and to distribute any profits.

Defendants consulted counsel about obtaining…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Jones v. MortimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Hannah v. SteinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. London & San Francisco Bank v. BandmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Riverisland Cold Storage, Inc. v. Fresno-Madera Production Credit Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. West Pico Furniture Co. v. Pacific Finance LoansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. G.H.I.I. v. MTS, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Ashland Oil Co. v. Union Oil Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Janisse v. Winston Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API