Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Herndon

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1929No. Docket No. 3665PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMISON, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of respondents in an action brought against them by appellants to restrain them, in the first count of the complaint, from proceeding with the sale of property, therein described, under a deed of trust to secure a note alleged to be usurious, and in the second count of said complaint demanding treble the amount of interest paid on said note and on a prior note executed by appellants to respondents Herndon and Finnigan.

The facts involved in this action are about as follows: Appellant Arthur H. Lamb held an option to purchase from…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cockle v. FlackSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Westbay v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Armstrong v. Sacramento Valley R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  4. McCord v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Crossman v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Gagnon Co., Inc. v. Nevada Desert InnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Goddard v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Stambaugh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Fisher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API