Legal Opinion
Maze v. Sycamore Homes, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 18, 1964No. Civ. 28270PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJefferson, J.
Defendant Sycamore Homes, Inc., is engaged in housing development and its activities included the development of a housing project in Torba Linda, Orange County. Plaintiffs are husband and wife, the husband being a paving contractor in Ventura, California. Defendant secured $24,000 from plaintiffs pursuant to the following agreement:
“Investment Agreement
“This agreement, executed on February 23, 1960, by and between Edward F. Maze and Edna Mae Maze, as tenants in common, hereinafter called Maze, and Sycamore Homes, Inc., hereinafter called Sycamore.
“Sycamore hereby acknowledges receipt from…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- In re Grand Union Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Thomas v. Hunt Manufacturing Corp.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Janisse v. Winston Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Martin v. Ajax Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Golden State Lanes v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. v. K & L Litho Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- WRI Opportunity Loans II, LLC v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Creative Ventures, LLC v. Jim Ward & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Strike v. Trans-West Discount Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.