Legal Opinion

Junkin v. Golden West Foreclosure Service, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 5, 2009No. A124374PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JONES, P. J.

In this appeal we consider whether the joint venture exception to the usury laws was properly applied by the trial court.

Appellant Donald L. Junkin III filed a complaint against respondents Golden West Foreclosure Service, Inc., and Gary Bennett, a fellow investor and acknowledged business partner, to enjoin the threatened foreclosure of an office building in San Carlos under an allegedly usurious promissory note and deed of trust held by Bennett. Ultimately, the foreclosure sale was completed. Junkin then amended his complaint to seek damages for wrongful foreclosure and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Tuchscher Development Enterprises, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. People v. ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Martin v. Ajax Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Sommer v. GaborCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. LFG National Capital, LLC v. GaryDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
  2. Cumbie v. TibblesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  3. Malley v. San Jose Midtown Development LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  4. Malley v. San Jose Midtown Development LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  5. Malley v. San Jose Midtown Development LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API