Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Hamilton
California Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1924No. L. A. No. 7734PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
W. W. Taylor and Lottie L. Taylor, plaintiffs, brought an action against Franklin IT. Hamilton, Franklin H. Hamilton, trustee, G. L. Graul, and G. L. Graul, trustee, to cancel an oil lease upon the ground that it expired by reason of the limitation of time provided by the lease. The amended complaint, which was filed on January 13, 1922, alleged that the plaintiffs were the owners in fee simple of the east one-half of farm lot 42, American Colony tract, situated in what is known as the Signal Hill oil field, about three-quarters of a mile from the Emits of the city of Long Beach, county of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chandler v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Brown v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Acme Oil and Mining Co. v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Jameson v. Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Cohn v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Western Oil & Refining Co. v. Venago Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Black v. Solano Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Hall v. AugurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Milovich v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.