Legal Opinion

Callahan v. Martin

California Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1935No. L. A. 12569PublishedCited by 173 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiff C. B. Callahan, as the owner in fee of real property in the county of Los Angeles, brought this action to quiet his title to said real property and “to oil, gas and other hydro-carbon substances and/or minerals in place within said land and to be produced, extracted and saved on or from said land”. Defendants Frank Martin and Stella Meyer Martin, his wife, claim an interest in said oil and other substances by virtue of an assignment to them of three per cent of all oil, gas and other hydro-carbon substances produced on said property, which assignment was executed by Jose…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Texas Company v. W.H. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. United States v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by173 opinions

  1. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Tanner v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. New v. NewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Dabney-Johnston Oil Corp. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API