Legal Opinion
Milovich v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 9, 1941No. Civ. 12135PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
This is an appeal from a final judgment in favor of plaintiff and against the City of Los Angeles and *367the Department of Water and Power of said city, rendered after trial by the court without a jury in an action for damages for an alleged breach on the part of said department of a construction contract awarded to plaintiff by the Board of Water and Power Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles. Appellants also attempt to appeal from the order denying a motion for a new trial. There is no appeal from such an order in a civil action of this nature.
At the trial the parties stipulated to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Davoust v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Sandstoe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Quatman v. McCrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Howard Contracting, Inc. v. G.A. MacDonald Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Straus v. North Hollywood Hospital, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Knight v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.