Acme Oil and Mining Co. v. Williams
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This is an action in ejectment, and plaintiff appeals on the judgment-roll alone from a judgment in favor of defendants.
The findings show that the defendant H. L. Williams on June 7,1897, leased certain oil lands in Santa Barbara County to plaintiff. The lease executed by the parties recites that, “In consideration' of the covenants and agreements hereinafter contained, and the royalties hereinafter reserved and agreed to be paid” him, Williams leased to the plaintiff company a described tract of land, and the right to enter thereon and bore wells for petroleum-oil, maltha, naphtha,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Petroleum Co. v. Coal, Coke, & Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Conrad v. . MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Maxwell v. . ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
3Cited by35 opinions
- Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Bandini Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- People v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.