Legal Opinion

Hall v. Augur

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1927No. Docket No. 4837PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALUCAS, J.,

pro tern. — These are consolidated actions for the purpose of quieting title against the various defendants to the property described in certain oil leases. Defendant Interstate Oil Corporation is the holder of said leases and appeals from the judgments rendered for plaintiffs.

Upon trial it was conceded by counsel for defendants that in each case the plaintiffs were the owners of the respective properties set forth in their respective complaints. The evidence offered and admitted showed an assignment by the defendants Augur, Trebell, and Young to the A. & T. Oil Company of the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lowther Oil Co. v. Miller-Sibley Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Steelsmith v. GartlanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Huggins v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1900
  4. Venture Oil Co. v. FrettsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Funk v. HaldemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Boatman v. AndreWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Scheel v. HarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Caswell v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API