Merchs.' Nat'l Bank of San Francisco v. Carmichael
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Gavin McNab, Nat Schmulowitz, and H. S. Derby, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment. The complaint states a cause of action to recover $4,126.65 upon a stated account alleged to have been made between D. W. Carmichael and the American Canon Water Company, and afterward transferred to the plaintiff. The defendant denies the making of the stated account, or of any agreement to pay the money sued for. The court made findings to the effect that no account had been stated by the said parties and that no sum was found due to the Water Company from the defendant Carmichael, and that he never agreed to pay said sum of money. Thereupon judgment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gardner v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Coffee v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Jasper Trust Co. v. LamkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Baird v. CrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by8 opinions
- Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Greenfield v. Sudden Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Mitchell v. FlemingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Hallford v. BairdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.