Coffee v. Williams
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and also from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
It is averred in the complaint (in brief) that on November 13, 1888, the two parties formed a copartnership in the business of farming and stock-raising, which continued until June 2, 1891, when it was dissolved by mutual consent; that they contributed equal amounts of capital and were to share equally in profits and losses; that on February 5, 1891, they had an accounting of all their partnership dealings down to that date, and thereupon “an account was stated” between…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hendy v. MarchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by38 opinions
- Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Gardner v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- McCarthy v. Mount Tecarte Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Martin v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1904
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.