Legal Opinion

Coffee v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1894No. 19316PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and also from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

It is averred in the complaint (in brief) that on November 13, 1888, the two parties formed a copartnership in the business of farming and stock-raising, which continued until June 2, 1891, when it was dissolved by mutual consent; that they contributed equal amounts of capital and were to share equally in profits and losses; that on February 5, 1891, they had an accounting of all their partnership dealings down to that date, and thereupon “an account was stated” between…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hendy v. MarchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Gardner v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. McCarthy v. Mount Tecarte Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Martin v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1904

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API