Southern Pacific Co. v. Spring Valley Water Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order refusing a new trial. William S. Wells, Judge. • The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Frank Thunen, Stanley Moore, Frank McGowan, and A. A. Moore, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
■ SHAW,
The object of this action was to have the right of the plaintiffs to receive water from the defendants’ main to the water-tank of the plaintiffs at Newark station in Alameda County declared and established, and to enjoin defendants from cutting the connection between said main and the tank, or from depriving plaintiffs of said water. The court made findings and gave its judgment in favor of the defendants. From this judgment and from an order denying a new trial the plaintiffs appeal.
The plaintiffs claim the right to have the delivery of water into their tanks at Newark continued…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Leavitt v. Lassen Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Copeland v. Fairview Land & Water Co. & Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Bellevue Borough v. Ohio Valley Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Echols v. New Orleans, Jackson & Great Northern RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Consolidated Theatres, Inc. v. Theatrical Stage Employees Union, Local 16California Supreme Court · 1968
- Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Great Western Distillery Products, Inc. v. John A. Wathen Distillery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- J. C. Millett Co. v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.