Baird v. Crank
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
Plaintiff commenced this action on the eighteenth day of May, 1889, to recover a balance due upon an account stated. It is alleged in the complaint that prior to the third day of July, 1888, at the city and county of San Francisco, plaintiff had done and performed for defendant, at his special instance and request, a large amount of services and labor, for which defendant was justly indebted to plaintiff in a large sum of money, and that on the day named it was agreed between the parties that such services were reasonably worth the sum of five thousand dollars, and defendant agreed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Tuggle v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Kahn v. D. P. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by15 opinions
- Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Gardner v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Cowell v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- O'Hanlon Co. v. JessMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- Converse v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.