Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Watson
California Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 1915No. L.A. No. 3458PublishedCited by 45 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an' order denying a new trial. Gavin W. Craig, Judge. :■ The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff sued upon the following instrument, as an account stated, averring a demand upon defendant and his refusal to pay, averring also defendant’s financial ability to pay:
" This Agreement, made between Robert J. Gardner, of Los Angeles, California, and Dr. C. P. V. Watson, of the same place,
“Witnesseth: That, whereas, the said Gardner in the year 1906 invested in the California Fruit Growers’ Association, the sum of three thousand dollars, and at the time of such investment the said Watson, together with one Bartlett entered into a contract with the said Gardner by the terms of which…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Galusha v. ShermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Coffee v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Hendy v. MarchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Crans v. . HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- S.O.S., Inc. v. Payday, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Professional Collection Consultants v. LauronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.