Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Fleming

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1926No. Docket No. 4144PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

Plaintiff instituted suit against defendants for the recovery of the sum of $400. The complaint consisted of three counts, each attempting to state, in a different form from the other two, a cause of action to recover a single judgment for the amount. Plaintiff had judgment as prayed and defendants appeal.

The first cause of action attempted to be set forth in the complaint was' demurred to on the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and the demurrer was overruled. It is now contended that the ruling was error. The first count alleges facts showing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Chace v. TraffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Martyn v. J. E. Amold & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1895
  4. Tuggle v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Converse v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dunham v. StitzbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Jones v. WiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Truestone, Inc. v. Simi West Industrial Park IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Boehmke v. WestfallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Sturges v. SturgesArizona Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API